中国向西联盟战略分析 作者:老军001 编者按:中国未来联盟道路分析这个专辑包含的内容有:第一集:序言,联盟的理论基础;第二集:中国向南联盟战略分析;第三集:中国向北联盟战略分析;第四集:中国向西联盟战略分析;第五集:中国向东联盟战略分析;第六集:中国在亚洲联盟一体化的地位分析;第七集:中国与欧盟联盟能力分析;第八集:中国与非洲联盟能力分析;第九集:中国与美洲联盟能力分析;第十集:中国寻找联盟国最佳道路分析;第十一集:未来联盟理论发展分析; 中国的西边有阿富汗,伊朗,中东,还有中东最西边叙利亚,这是中国古代丝绸之路达到的最远方,现今能否超越古人就看我们的西面联盟能力了,说起西边,不能不谈美军的存在,他的中东有军事基地,在阿富汗有驻军,而且现在在伊拉克也有驻军,虽说要撤离一些但是老军001认为他们还会保留军事基地的存在的,这就是美国人制衡战略,所以我们的西向联盟不能不谈美国的存在,因为也绕不开美国,这就构建西向联盟存在了一定的难度。 现在互联网上一些人不是说是构建欧亚铁路吗,这倒是一个好思路,就是投资大,需要得到各个国家的投资,大家一起凑钱才行,估计美国人是不会干这个事情的,人家聪明着呢,不会干这个给别人做嫁衣的事情,那么我们的西边联盟的思路还有那些呢?这点老军001给出一些思路。 一个是基于西边联盟自己独立的道路,就是基于欧亚铁路的中东线路,先从中国新疆,到阿富汗,到伊朗联通,然后慢慢的向中东叙利亚挺进,一点一点发展,先做贸易,然后看着贸易规模,一点一点构建经济联盟体,这样可以正好把我们的南面联盟体与西边联盟起来,这样中国的势力范围也就越来越大了,有人说中国修铁路就是不能怕西边战乱,其实不怕战乱的,有了战乱中国正好和美国一起出兵维稳,正好还可以锻炼我们的军人,培养军队干部梯队建设。 有人说我们西边联盟不能要美国参与,自己单独干,老军001认为这是不现实的想法,因为西边是人家出兵打下来的江山社稷,你摆脱美国单干,肯定不符合实际,问题是我们拉着美军一起干联盟体,这思路也是比较好的,也对中国有利,你想呀,中东离美国多远,离我们多近,要是铁路修好了,一条龙都到了我们的家门口,中东的资源矿产都到了中国新疆,你美国不还得海运才能到本土吗,这成本多高呀,这样久而久之美国也就势力消弱了,所以我们西边联盟不怕美国的参与。 总之构建中国西边联盟的思路就是,拉着美国一起干,长远讲有利于我们,而且美国也有可能接受,看看这个多方联盟能碰出火花不,看世界大势的发展了。 老军001写于 Author: old solider 001 China on the west of Afghanistan, Iran, Middle East, Middle East and the west Syria, this is China's ancient silk road to the most distant, can now see the ancient beyond our ability to the west of alliance, speaking of the west, have to talk about the existence of the U.S., his Middle East have military bases in Afghanistan have garrison, and now in Iraq also have garrison, although to leave some but old solider 001 think they still keep the military base there, it is the American people strategic balances, so we can't talk about the United States with the west, the existence of winding don't open the United States because, the building of the west to alliance exist certain difficulty. Now some people on the Internet is not build the Eurasian rail? It's a good idea is to invest big, need to get countries of the investment, everyone together in to just go, estimates that americans won't do it, this countary is clever, won't do this to other people do the things outfit, so we on the west side of the league and those ideas? This old solider 001 give some ideas. A is based on their own independent road on the west alliance, which is based on the Eurasian rail line in the Middle East, first from xinjiang, China, to Afghanistan, Iran unicom, then slowly to the Middle East into Syria, little development, trade to do first, and then look at the trade scale, little economic alliance body building, so that we can just south of alliance body and the west union up, so that Chinese territory is more and more big, someone said China is not afraid of the west make a railway war, in fact not afraid of war, a war with the United States and China just sending troops to do stability, as it happens can train our soldiers, cultivating military cadres echelon construction. Some people say we can't want the United States involved in the west alliance, oneself go it alone and old solider 001 don't think this is the idea of reality, Because the west is the U.S. troops down mountain country, you get rid of the do-it-yourself, certainly do not accord with the actual, the problem is we pull together U.S. dry alliance body, this idea is good, but also to China's favorable, you think ah, from the United States in the Middle East, how far away from us many close, if railway repaired, one-stop came our door, the Middle East mineral resources in xinjiang, China, you don't have to sea to the United States to local? This cost many high ah, such as time passes the In short building on the west side of the alliance of Chinese thought is, took the America to do, long-term speak to us, and the United States is also likely to accept, look at this multilateral alliance can touch a flick not, see the world the development of the half. Old solider001 written on October 24, 2011