[著作]李萬居傳記 / 楊錦麟著
臺北 : 人間出版社, 1993
做為一個愛國者，重要的政治家，和不辭鼎鑊捍衛言論自由的台灣知識份子，這一部「魯莽書生」李萬居的生史，鮮活地呈現了早期在台灣孤軍搏擊，反對國民黨法西斯獨裁的民主化運動中，色彩最鮮明，性格最獨特，際遇最富悲劇的人物像。
http://store.pchome.com.tw/renjian/M02398407.htm
相关：
尋求李萬居思想的重新定位：紀念李萬居先生一百週年冥誕
Seeking to reevaluate the thought of Lee Wan-chu:
The hundredth anniversary birth
陳儀深／Chen Yi-Shen
（中研院近史所副研究員）
（Associate Research Fellow, Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica）
2001-08-13
| 過去代表性的兩本李萬居傳記，即鍾楊瑞先 的《珠沉滄海》和廈門大學教授楊錦麟的《 李萬居評傳》，雖然各有所長，但涉及李氏 的民族思想部分，都太誇大其中國意識、中 國認同，忽略歷史階段的不同，以及文化、 政治不同層次的問題，甚至有不合事實的所 謂「五點遺囑」之說，（鍾楊瑞先版的第五 點謂：我沒有親眼見光復大陸，覺得抱憾終 生）之說，幸經李南雄先生在2001年接受筆 者訪談的口述紀錄中予以更正。今逢李萬居 先生的百歲冥誕紀念，應該是重新定位其政 治思想的適當時刻。 |
Although both biographies of Lee Wan-chu, the "Deep Blue Sea" by Chung Yang Jui-hsien, and the "Critical Biography of Lee Wan-chu" by Professor Yang Chin-lin of Xiamen University, have their merits, the sections on Lee's thoughts on ethnicity overstate his feelings for and identification with China, and neglect the different periods he went through in his life, and the issues of different levels of culture and politics, even to the extent of conflicting with the facts of his so-called "five-point will" (Chung Yang Jui-hsien's version of the five points reads: "I have not lived to see the restoration of the mainland, which I will regret all my life."). In an oral interview which I recorded with Mr. Lee Nan-hsiung this year, he corrected this. On this centenary of Lee Wan-chu's birth, we should reevaluate the timeliness of his political thought. |
ybtdd
有報天天讀 [首播：中文台周一至五 12:35] [重播：17:30;（次日02:15）] 节目内容充实，信息丰富，节奏明快，充满动感和创意。既有个性，也有独到见解。杨锦麟先生声情并茂，言简意赅。节目内容除电视平台外，延伸至: [《有报》手機版］[《有报》宽频][《有报》博客]。欢迎届时收看!節目郵箱:tintindu@ifeng.com
