<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>liu6465的凤凰博客</title>
        <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/721122.html</link>
        <description><![CDATA[liu6465的凤凰博客]]></description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:43:05 +0800</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:43:05 +0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>REBORN 1.0(beta)</generator>
        <language>zh-cn</language>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[广西青年被冤枉杀人服刑9年续:真凶自首1年后被释放]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/16320120.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[广西青年王子发被判处死缓入狱九年后，真凶自首承认了杀人，法院拖了三年改判王子发无罪并给予国家赔偿。但没想到的是，真凶早在“自首”一年后就给释放了。更没想到的是，冤案平反多年了，办案人员仍然没有受到法律追究。 <WBR><WBR><WBR>这又让我想起河北农民李志平死刑冤案，尽管河北省定州市公安机关羁押他七年后，已在1990年7月以取保候审方式将他释放，又在取保候审十六年后的2006年7月解除了对他的取保候审强制措施，但是由于真凶一直没有落网，公安机关仍然以种种借口不同意撤销他的“故意杀人”案，也不给予任何经济上的赔偿和补偿。<WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><STRONG><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR> 青年被冤枉杀人服刑9年续:真凶自首1年后被释放</STRONG><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR> 中国青年报 <WBR><WBR><WBR>2012-02-15<WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR> 9年冤狱，“真 ……<br/><br/>……<FONT size=+0><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000><WBR></FONT></STRONG></FONT><FONT color=#ff0000><STRONG><A href="http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_49daf0ea010084op.html" target=_blank></STRONG></FONT></A>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/16320120.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:00:31 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>16320120</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[再谈成立“便衣警察局”的问题]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/16318670.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<SPAN id=spanimg_1984559 class=cc><TABLE><TBODY><TR><TD><IMG id=insertimg_1984559 src="http://blogfile.ifeng.com/uploadfiles/blog_attachment/1202/22/721122_cff16df3405b62c8f752c38db63e37f1.jpg" width=400 height=265></TD></TR><TR><TD><DIV id=inserttext_1984559 class=insertpictext><FONT size=1>媒体报道称，2月13日，贵阳市公安局便衣侦查分局挂牌成立。据了解，为应严打“两抢一盗”新形势的要求，进一步提高市民安全感，贵阳市公安局创新警务模式，抽调精兵强将成立了便衣侦查分局。分局将根据警情投放便衣警力，做到信息导警和动态布警。便衣警察通过隐蔽跟踪、秘密监控、择机抓现等手段，实施全时空滚动打击。</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR> 我以为，贵阳市公安局成立便衣侦查分局已算不上是“创新警务模式”了。</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR> 据2007年9月17日《法制日报》报道，云南省昆明市公安局几年前率先在全国成立了便衣警察分局，便衣警察分局办公大楼不挂牌，400名民警分布车站、码头等案件高发地带，身装便服，还不时化装成擦皮鞋者、三轮车夫。在便衣分局进进出出的人， ……<br/><br/>……</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></SPAN>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/16318670.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:53:55 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>16318670</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[越南特色的民主政治]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/16291551.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px">（注，文章转自网络，作者不详。将这篇文章与《<A href="http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_49daf0ea0102dy4r.html">越南改革何以后来居上？</A>》放在一起来读，相信会给你带来很多思考。）</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px" color=#05111a size=5>越南的民主改革始于1986年，经过20年的努力，越南的民主改革已经取得实质性的进展，主要表现在以下五个方面：</FONT></FONT></FONT><P align=left><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 18pt"><FONT color=#05111a><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px">　　<STRONG>越南共产党已经基本实现了党内民主：</STRONG></FONT></FONT></FONT><P align=left><FONT color=#05111a><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px">　　一、是强化中央委员会对中央政治局和中央书记处的监督。越共规定对重大政策主张、重要干部任免、大型工程项目等都要在中央委员会集体民主讨论基础上进行无记名投票表决。</FONT></FONT><P align=left><FONT color=#05111a><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px">　　二、是越共在中央全会上实行质询制度，开创了党内民主的新形式。每位中央委员都可以对包括总书记在内的其它委员提出质询，也可以对中央政治局、中央书记处、中央检查委员会集体提出质询，直到得 ……<br/><br/>……</FONT></FONT><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left><P align=left>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/16291551.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:04:27 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>16291551</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[越南改革何以后来居上？]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/16288571.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[越  南 改 革 何 以 后 来 居 上？<DIV><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR> 作者：罗天昊</DIV><DIV><WBR></DIV><DIV><WBR></DIV><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR>今年春节前夕，中国掀起一股纪念邓小平南巡20周年的风潮，个中意义深远。　　20年前，邓小平南巡，为当时陷入困境中的改革摇旗呐喊。最近几年，中国改革的停滞乃至倒退，由此社会各方，均呼喊改革需要新的动力。　　他山之石，可以攻玉，同为社会主义国家，最近几年，越南国势蒸蒸日上，其奥秘何在?　　东亚崛起，群龙竞舞。以“升龙”为国都的越南，同为龙图腾之国，其现代化，亦与中国基本同步。目前，亚洲已经成为全球经济发展的发动机，而在其中，中国、印度、越南的崛起，日益引人注目。　　“龙象之争”，世 ……<br/><br/>……<WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/16288571.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:37:38 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>16288571</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[对“吴英们”能否不适用死刑?]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15972786.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px">据媒体报道, 2012年1月18日下午，浙江省高级人民法院对被告人吴英集资诈骗一案进行二审宣判，裁定驳回被告人吴英的上诉，维持一审的死刑判决，依法报请最高人民法院复核。法院认定，吴英集资诈骗数额特别巨大，给国家和人民利益造成了重大损失，犯罪情节特别严重，应依法严惩。吴英于2005年5月至2007年2月间向社会公众非法集资7.7亿元，案发时尚有3.8亿元无法归还，还有大量的欠债。</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR> 就在吴英被二审驳回上诉前四天，即在2012年1月14日下午，河南省安阳市中级人民法院以集资诈骗罪判处刘洪飞死刑，剥夺政治权利终身，并处没收个人全部财产。当地警方调查发现，2005年8月至2011年10月长达6年的时间内 ……<br/><br/>……</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><WBR>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15972786.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:01:07 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15972786</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[维权人士李祥谋案何时了？]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15943421.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[2011年10月28日，李祥谋被控组织他人偷越国边境罪案，在石狮市人民法院开庭审理。随后，案件一直未作判决。据悉，石狮市人民法院决定案件延长审限，至2012年1月17日止。 <font style="font-size: 16px;">     就在前两天，李祥谋弟弟给法官打电话询问案件何时判决。法官答复说，自己也不知案件该如何办？无法，他弟弟再给泉州市政法委联系。政法委的人称，今天会给一个答复。今晚，李祥谋弟弟打来电话说，今天打了政法委电话，但联系不上人了。</font><font style="font-size: 16px;">     李祥谋是因为带领福远渔“628”船遇难者家属讨海难真相和说法，在2009年3月9日全国“两会”召开期间，被福建省泉州市警方抓捕。随后，五易涉嫌罪名，最终控以涉嫌组织他人偷越国边境罪逮捕和起 ……<br/><br/>……</font>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15943421.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:03:38 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15943421</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[“知青领袖”丁惠民的劳教案]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15912075.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<strong> “知青领袖”丁惠民的劳教案</strong><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr> 丁惠民是1978年底至1979年初，云南知青进京请愿团的总指挥，被称为“知青领袖”。<wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr> 按《南方周末》说法，三十多年来，他始终没有走出“知青领袖梦”。从2008年起，已经退休的他，又站了出来帮助老知青们维权。<wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr> 据2009年1月7日《南方周末》刊发的“青春有悔？无悔？走不出的知青领袖梦”报道称，“他频频来到上海，出面帮知青解决工龄问题、社保问题、户口问题，等等等等。他回到云南，在那里立起一块大牌子：“知青有事，请找丁惠民。”下面留着手机号。三十多年后，他第二次写了公开信，要求政府重视知青的晚景和待遇问题。”<wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr>2009年5月21日，丁惠民在重庆市渝中区肖家湾景程宾馆成立“ ……<br/><br/>……<wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><font color="#ff360b"><wbr><wbr></font><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><strong><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr></strong><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><strong><wbr><wbr></strong><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><strong><wbr></strong><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><strong><font style="font-size: 16px;"><font color="#ff3c00"><wbr></font></font></strong>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15912075.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:44:43 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15912075</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[由朝鲜的大赦，想到中国的特赦]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15839790.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[据朝中社1月10日报道，为迎接金日成诞辰100周年（4月15日）和金正日诞辰70周年（2月16日），朝鲜将从2月1日起实施大赦。朝鲜最高人民会议常任委员会5日发布政令说，大赦将从2月1日起实施，朝鲜内阁和相关部门将采取相应措施，保证获赦人员能够重新融入社会、开始工作和<a title="生活" href="http://tuan.163.com/?tag=%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB">生活</a>。不过赦令没有透露此次大赦的对象和获赦者的人数。政令说，继承和发扬金日成和金正日的“仁德政治”和“宽容政治”，是朝鲜党和国家坚定不移的立场。<wbr><wbr><wbr> 这是朝鲜近两年来第二次在特殊日子搞大赦。早在2010年10月，朝鲜为纪念劳动党成立55周年，大规模赦免了15万名囚犯，并强调这得益于金正恩大将的“大度恩德”。金正恩是金正日之子，他在2 ……<br/><br/>……<wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15839790.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:34:09 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15839790</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[两头都是弃儿的异乡人]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15814916.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<H2>异乡人</H2><DIV class=text>稿源：南方人物周刊  |  作者：本刊记者 林珊珊 发自上海日期：2012-01-06<P class=summary>对于这些上海知青和他们的后代来说，户口和身份认同始终遥不可及：在新疆，他们是上海人；在上海，他们又成了新疆人<IMG alt="" src="http://blog.ifeng.com/Uploads/201201/20120106_144452_192.jpg">上海知青在新疆开荒<IMG alt="" src="http://blog.ifeng.com/Uploads/201201/20120106_144934_112.jpg" width=425 height=250>上海知青在新疆开会<IMG alt="" src="http://blog.ifeng.com/Uploads/201201/20120106_145025_163.jpg">韦木英（图/小左）<IMG alt="" src="http://blog.ifeng.com/Uploads/201201/20120106_145127_159.jpg">吴祥志（图/本刊记者 林珊珊）<IMG alt="" src="http://blog.ifeng.com/Uploads/201201/20120106_145201_168.jpg">谢虎礼父子（图/小左）<IMG alt="" src="http://blog.ifeng.com/Uploads/201201/20120106_145350_118.jpg" width=425 height=273>由新疆回来的知青组成的“上海阿凡提歌舞团”在虹口公园表演（图/小左）<IMG alt="" src="http://blog.ifeng.com/Uploads/201201/20120106_145944_196.jpg">张宝璇（图/小左）<SPAN style="COLOR: rgb(255,0,0)"><STRONG>我一定让你走得风风光光</STRONG></SPAN>　　一个月里，吴祥志们又送走了6位老人。　　秋天时，他去看望唐长根。那时，老唐戴着呼吸机，烦躁地躺在床上。老唐肺癌已到晚期，而医保卡里的３万块报销额度早就用光了。那个下午，他抱怨起悲哀的 ……<br/><br/>……<FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><STRONG><FONT color=#ff3306><WBR></FONT></STRONG></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px" color=#ff3306><STRONG><WBR></STRONG></FONT><SPAN><STRONG><FONT color=#ff3306><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><SPAN><A title="从“变相劳改”到“正式劳教” <wbr><WBR></A></SPAN></FONT></FONT></STRONG></SPAN></DIV>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15814916.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:05:36 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15814916</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[从“变相劳改”到“正式劳教” ——谈丁惠民的生存权]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15801159.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[从“变相劳改”到“正式劳教”<WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR>——谈丁惠民的生存权<WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR>（ <WBR>作者 <WBR>程映虹）<WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR>2009 年我写过一篇文章，题目是“知青回城——一场被遗忘的维权抗争运动”，介绍新加坡国立大学杨斌教授关于70年代末云南知青发动返城运动的研究。杨教授的文章是经过大量采访后写成的，发表在那年英国的《中国季刊》杂志上，在当年该刊的“好文排行榜”上排名第二。杨教授认为，作为自发性的和大规模的社会请愿运动（在中国这样的制度下其实也就是一种反抗运动），70年代末的云南知青返城运动是1949年以来唯一一次获得胜利的，因为它有以下三个有利因素：请愿运动领导人和参与者正确的组织和策略、中共高层内部的斗争（“凡是”派和“真理”派），还有有利的国 ……<br/><br/>……<WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><STRONG><FONT color=#ff2f0b></FONT></STRONG>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15801159.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:42:32 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15801159</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[知青维权代表丁惠民被劳教，提起行政诉讼法院不受理]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15774884.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<FONT size=1>丁惠民，是1978年底至1979年初，云南知青进京请愿团总指挥。他返城后，仍然坚持帮助各地知青维权。</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR> 2011年7月6日，重庆市江北区警方以他2010年9月25日在互联网上发表了《全国知青联合起来》文章，煽动知青群体集体示威，向政府施压为由，对其作出行政拘留十五天处罚。同年7月8日，江北区警方撤销行政拘留处罚，认为原处罚不适当，且已批准劳动教养。同年7月9日，市劳动教养管理委员会作出劳动教养决定书，对丁惠民处以两年的劳动教养。</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR> 劳动教养决定书称，丁惠民于2009年5月21日在渝中区肖家湾景程宾馆成立“重庆支边知青赴京汇报团”，随后于5月2日组织赴京汇报团成员30余人及欢送人员（支边青年近百人、 ……<br/><br/>……</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><WBR><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><WBR><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><STRONG><WBR></STRONG></FONT>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15774884.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:21:51 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15774884</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[李志平死刑冤案还要拖到何时？]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15765050.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[1月3日，我在重庆时接到河北农民李志平来电。他告诉我说，正在定州市公安局找肖政委，肖政委称，他的冤案还是要去找法院解决。李志平问我怎么办？我说，肖政委要你去找法院解决，不能只是口头说说，必须要公安局出具书面说明。 <WBR><WBR><WBR>因为早在一年多前的 2010年12月23日，定州市公安局、市政法委、市信访办就李志平要求撤销杀人一案联合召开过听证会。但事过一年多了，也没有作出书面决定。<WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR>李志平死刑冤案，当年河北省高级法院两次以证据不足为由发回重审，在第二次发回重审时，保定中级法院将案件退回给检察院，检察院又将案件退回定县公安局（即现在的定州市公安局）。据称，当时定县公安局不愿接受退回的案件，后来，当年的保定地委作 ……<br/><br/>……<WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><STRONG><WBR></STRONG><A href="http://liu6465.fyfz.cn/cat/11857.htm"><STRONG></A><A href="http://liu6465.fyfz.cn/cat/11857.htm"></STRONG></A>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15765050.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:56:52 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15765050</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[劳教丁惠民，赔了公信力，明智吗？]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15744870.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<STRONG>劳教丁惠民，赔了公信力，明智吗？</STRONG><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR>作者：中条山人 <WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px">(转自 <WBR></FONT><A href="http://blog.ycwb.com/archiver/?tid-721687.html"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px">http://blog.ycwb.com/archiver/?tid-721687.html</FONT></A><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px">）</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR>丁惠民于2011年7月6日晚上被重庆市江北区公安分局传讯，当晚十一点被通知行政拘留十五天，7日凌晨一点多进入江北区拘留所，提审时送达市劳教委《渝劳聆北(2011)第10011号聆询告知书》，提示，丁惠民在接到该告知书后的两日内(7月9日晚上12点以前)随时有权提出要求聆询的申请，可是市劳教委在7月9日同时已经作出了将丁惠民劳教两年的决定，罪名是“破坏社会秩序”。　　事情的起因是丁惠民于2009年5月24日组织原重庆赴云南支边知青赴京上访，向中央有 ……<br/><br/>……<FONT color=#ff3203></FONT></FONT><FONT color=#ff3203 size=3><WBR></FONT><P style="TEXT-INDENT: 21pt; mso-char-indent-count: 2.0">]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15744870.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:01:45 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15744870</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[“反革命”罪被蒙冤四十载，至死没有得到国家赔偿]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15736430.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<FONT size=1><FONT size=1> 今天，我登陆邮箱看到戴<FONT size=3>熙</FONT>亮儿子发来的邮件，才知戴<FONT size=3>熙</FONT>亮老先生在十几天前已逝世。看了邮件，我心情沉重。老先生的反革命冤案虽然得到了平反，但是国家始终没有给他进行赔偿，确实是有愧于他。象戴<FONT size=3>熙</FONT>亮哪样被反革命罪蒙冤得不到国家赔偿的老人，我以前还遇到过几个。</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px" size=1><WBR><WBR> 国家每年“三公”消费高达九千亿，为何就会没钱赔偿这些蒙冤人？</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px" size=1><WBR><WBR> 如今，戴熙亮老人已去世了，再也不向你国家要赔偿了。</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px" size=1><WBR><WBR> 今天，我还接到蒙冤者李志平来电，他说定州市公安局仍然不同意撤销案件，也不可能给他任何赔偿。李志平蒙冤已二十九年，人也近花甲之年了，真不知他在有生之前能否得到国家赔偿？</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><FONT color=#ff2f0b><STRONG>附：</STRONG></FONT></FONT><A href="http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_49daf0ea01017fez.html"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px" color=#ff2f0b><STRONG>“反革命”罪被蒙冤四十载，谁来出钱赔偿古稀老人</STRONG></FONT></A>（<FONT size=3>戴熙亮案</FONT>）<SPAN><A title=被冤枉了四十年，只还清白不给国家赔偿 href="http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_49daf0ea0100ftui.html" target=_blank><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px" color=#ff2f0b><STRONG>被冤枉了 ……<br/><br/>……</STRONG></FONT></A></SPAN><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"></FONT></FONT>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15736430.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:18:51 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15736430</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[上海维权老太太张维敏，二审被改判缓刑]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15496481.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[今天下午二时，上海市第二中级人民法院对张维敏案进行二审宣判。此前，法官通知我说，张维敏要求解聘律师，因此，我无法去出席公开宣判。张维敏儿子说，宣判是在一个小法庭进行，家属拿到了五张旁听证。<WBR><WBR> 下午二时二十八分，张维敏儿子给我打来电话说案件已经宣判，由原一审法院判的三年六个月有期徒刑，现改判为三年有期徒刑，缓期三年执行。<WBR><WBR> 我以为，上海市第二中级人民法院的终审判决，仍然没有坚守公平与正义最后一道防线，而是以改判缓刑的“和稀泥”方式，平息家属和支青们的愤怒。为了改判张维敏缓刑，不仅要她写了认罪书，而且还要她解聘了律师。<WBR> 作为张维敏案二审被解聘的律师，我认为二审改判缓刑完全是错误的，而应当撤销一审的判决 ……<br/><br/>……<WBR><FONT color=#ff3d13><STRONG><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT></STRONG></FONT>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15496481.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:27:24 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15496481</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[老太太上访被判三年半，一份发不出的二审辩护词]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15441802.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<WBR><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px">十一月十日，我在上海市黄浦区看守所会见了张维敏，她在家属给我的授权委托书上签名确认，同意由我担任她的二审辩护律师。</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR> 十一月二十三日，一审法院将案件材料移送给上海市第二中级法院后，我联系上了二中法院本案的主审法官，我询问了递交委托手续之事，法官说可以邮寄过来。我问法官，案件何时开庭？法官说没有决定是开庭审理，还是书面审理，如要开庭审理会通知。随即，我用特快专递邮寄委托手续给法官。由于法官没有通知我何时开庭，我以为很可能会是书面审理。如是书面审理的话，法官会通知律师寄书面辩护词。</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR>不论是书面审理，还是开庭审理，辩护律师都要提交辩护词。为了防止法院突然通知开庭，或突然通知说是书面审理要求寄辩护词，我在 ……<br/><br/>……</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><STRONG><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></STRONG></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR></FONT><WBR><STRONG><FONT color=#ff3d13><WBR></FONT></STRONG><STRONG><FONT color=#ff3d13><WBR></FONT></STRONG><WBR>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15441802.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:37:53 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15441802</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[维权老知青张维敏案即将宣判，辩护律师却被解聘]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15421627.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[十一月九日，应张维敏家属聘请，我从广州飞至上海，第二天（十一月十日），在上海市黄浦看守所会见了张维敏。张维敏亲笔在委托书上签名确认了对我的授权，还与我详细谈了她的案件。我问她，如果上诉被驳回，坐了三年半牢狱后，还会带领老知青维权吗？她明确告诉我，只要老知青问题没有解决，她还会继续维权下去。如果老知青问题得到了解决，自己被冤枉坐三年半牢也值得。<FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR> 张维敏带领老知青从2003年开始上访维权，至今已经八年多了。期间，她被拘留过，还被劳教过，今年四月中旬，又以涉嫌聚众扰乱公共场所秩序罪将她刑拘。</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR> 在刑事侦查阶段，不知是张维敏被人误导了，还是自认为事情不大，在侦查的笔录中，警察记录了她不要律师的话。但在案 ……<br/><br/>……</FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR></FONT><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><WBR><WBR><WBR></FONT>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15421627.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:48:56 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15421627</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[王荔蕻走出看守所]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15412278.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[在羁押九个月后，王荔蕻终于走出朝阳区看守所。她是因在2010年4月16日到福建省福州市马尾法院围观福建三网民案，在事过近一年后，被北京市朝阳区公安分局以涉嫌寻衅滋事罪刑拘，最终被北京市朝阳区人民法院以寻衅滋事罪判处有期徒刑九个月。这是一起很荒唐的案件，请看我的一审和二审辩护词。<WBR> 但愿她走出看守所后，能过上正常人生活，从此不再被骚扰和监控。附：<DIV style="FLOAT: left"><IMG title=王荔蕻走出看守所 alt=王荔蕻走出看守所 src="http://liu6465.fyfz.cn/res/blog/image/tju.jpg" width=17 height=17 real_src="http://liu6465.fyfz.cn/res/blog/image/tju.jpg"><A title=王荔蕻寻衅滋事案，我的一份辩护词 href="http://liu6465.fyfz.cn/art/1041010.htm" target=_blank>王荔蕻寻衅滋事案，我的一份辩护词</A></DIV><WBR><SPAN><A title=王荔蕻寻衅滋事案，我的二审辩护词 href="http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_49daf0ea0102dt5p.html" target=_blank>王荔蕻寻衅滋事案，我的二审辩护</A><A title=王荔蕻寻衅滋事案，我的二审辩护词 href="http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_49daf0ea0102dt5p.html" target=_blank>词</A></SPAN>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15412278.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:53:24 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15412278</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[上访讨要平等医保待遇，花甲老太被判刑三年半]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15176236.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[11月10日，我在上海市黄浦区看守所会见了六十四岁的张维敏。这是一起因上访引发的聚众扰乱公共场所秩序罪案件。一个六十四岁的老太太，因为组织了一批与她年龄相仿的老人，向上海市人力资源和社会保障局和上海市人民政府讨要“平等医保”待遇，仅仅是因为上访人数众多，上访次数也多，就被治罪重判三年半有期徒刑。<wbr><wbr><wbr> 聚众扰乱公共场所秩序罪，其刑罚有管制、拘役、有期徒刑，最高刑期是五年。<wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr>黄浦区人民检察院在起诉书中称，对张维敏可以从轻判处，黄浦区人民法院在判决书中也认为，对张维敏可以从轻判处。现处以三年半有期徒刑，这会是从轻判罚吗？就此量刑，我向一个刑事审判庭庭长咨询，人家明确告知，五年最高刑期判三年半，根本谈不上从 ……<br/><br/>……<wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><u><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr></U><p align=left><wbr><p align=left><p align=center><b><wbr></b><p align=center><p align=center><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><b><wbr></b><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><b><wbr></b><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><p align=left><p align=left><wbr><b><wbr></b><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr><wbr>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/15176236.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:02:40 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>15176236</guid>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[林洪楠律师起诉福州市司法局案，何时了？]]></title>
            <link>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/14950875.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[因为担任福建三网民案中吴华英的辩护人，林洪楠律师被重提八年前办理吴华英弟弟“福清纪委爆炸案”中的“泄密”问题。就在福建三网民案即将开庭时，福州市司法局下发通知告知林洪楠律师要作出行政处罚。随后召开了听证会，2009年12月17日，福州市司法局正式作出停止执业一年处罚，成功阻劫林洪楠律师担任吴华英的辩护人。<p align=left><font style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><wbr><wbr>林洪楠律师不服停止执业一年处罚，在福建省司法厅复议维持处罚决定后，向福州市台江区人民法院提起行政诉讼，案件于2010年3月29日正式立案。2010年7月22日，台江区人民法院开庭审理了林洪楠律师诉福州市司法局一案。开庭时，如临大敌，法院外面道路被交通管制，进入法院需要经过三道安检，法 ……<br/><br/>……</FONT><p align=left><font style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><wbr><wbr></FONT><p align=left><font style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><wbr><wbr></FONT><p align=left><font style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><wbr><wbr></FONT><p align=left><font style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><wbr><wbr></FONT><p align=left><font style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><wbr><wbr></FONT><p align=left><font style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><wbr></font><p align=left><p align=left><table border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0><tbody><tr><td><p align=left></td></tr></tbody></table><p align=left><p align=left><p align=left><p align=left><p align=left><p align=left><p align=left><a title="“干掉”律师 难道也是推动法治进程？" href=# target=><font style="FONT-SIZE: 16px" color=#084487><wbr></font></a><p align=left><p align=left><p align=left><p align=left><p align=left><font style="FONT-SIZE: 16px"><a title=福建网民诬告陷害案即将开庭，律师收到停业处罚告知书 href=# target=></font></A>]]></description>
            <author>liu6465</author>
            <comments>http://blog.ifeng.com/article/14950875.html#comment</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:29:03 +0800</pubDate>
            <guid>14950875</guid>
        </item>
            </channel>
</rss>
